What is the perfect age to get married for both men and women?

Click here: => gucodisua.fastdownloadcloud.ru/dt?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MzA6Imh0dHA6Ly9iYW5kY2FtcC5jb21fZHRfcG9zdGVyLyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6MzI6IkJlc3QgYWdlIGZvciBtYXJyaWFnZSBmb3IgYSBnaXJsIjt9


You may see celebrities with huge age gaps with a successful marriage, but do you think you could be one of them? If you're ready to marry the person you're with, you'll automatically value his opinion. Here is what the Mahabharata translator says in a footnote: Nagnika is said to be one who wears a single piece of cloth.

A sign of a healthy relationship is being able to display a mutual respect when disagreeing, rather than trying control him or force your values onto him. On the other hand if the wife happens to be much older than the husband, she may be more of a mother to him and not be able to play the role of a wife. But when time passes and reality kicks in, you realise what you have got yourself into. There is also a prayaschittam for performing after puberty.

Which is the best age range to get marry for men?

Understand that in Hinduism shruti and smriti are different books. Shruti being eternal and God's words don't deal with anthropic world. Smriti including Manusmriti, Itihasa, Purana are written by man and hence have a limited scope and utility. So, when you are asking about jurisprudence in Hinduism which are governed by smritis, you are asking the wrong question, because religious laws in Hinduism is subjected to social and temporal scrutiny. The only place I have ever seen him use the word hatred about his own personal feelings was when he wrote that he had a strong hatred for it and would have nothing to do with it or anyone that condoned it. There is nothing in Sruti to condone it. They are the definitive guidelines for mankind for the well being to prevent wrongdoings. For each yuga, different smriti is suited. For example for kritha yuga, manu smriti is suited, for kali yuga parashara smriti is suited. Bhishma says much the same thing in of the Anushasana Prava of the Mahabharata: A person of thirty years of age should wed a girl of ten years of age called a Nagnika. Or, a person of one and twenty years of age should wed a girl of seven years of age. Note that these recommendations are more binding for the lower bound rather than the upper bound. Here is what the Mahabharata translator says in a footnote: Nagnika is said to be one who wears a single piece of cloth. A girl in whom the signs of puberty have not appeared does not require more than a single piece of cloth to cover her. The mention of Nagnika, the commentator thinks, is due to an interdiction about wedding a girl of even ten years in whom signs of puberty have appeared. The point of these recommendations isn't to prevent a man from marrying a 20-year old woman. It is fine to marry a girl who hasn't reached puberty yet, and it is fine to marry a woman who is well-past the onset of puberty. What is problematic is marrying a girl who is a no-man's land, just at the threshold of puberty. When a girl who hasn't reached puberty gets married, she would live with her husband's family and not have any relations with her husband until she reached maturity. And when a woman who is well-past puberty gets married, she jumps directly into marital life. But there are risks in the transitioning period, as a girl is physically developing but she has not yet reached the age of consent yet. That is what the recommendation is intended to prevent. Yogi That's why I said these recommendations are more binding for the lower bound than the upper bound. Once both the bride and groom are relatively old, then the age difference doesn't really matter although the groom should still be older than the bride. As far as why child marriages are allowed, for one thing it's a way of ensuring that nothing bad happens; an unmarried girl is more likely to run off with some boy, as opposed to a girl who is already at her husband's house. Also, it allows the bride to develop a Platonic attachment to her husband before puberty. Manu smriti is suited for Krita yuga. There is also a prayaschittam for performing after puberty. In olden days, the concept of 'child marriage' did not mean 'child physical relations' which is what most people who deride it today think of. The bride would only be sent to groom's house after puberty. Source - personal family ancestors. I don't have any opinion for this Qn. It's more of a mental bonding, where girl starts seeing her husband as her protector and master. Presenting a reference from Mahabharata : A person of thirty years of age should wed a girl of ten years of age called a Nagnika. That girl who has no brother nor father should not be wed, O chief of Bharata's race, for she may be intended as Putrika of her sire. On the fourth year, she should look for a husband herself without waiting any longer for her kinsmen to select one for her. The offspring of such a girl do not lose their respectability, nor does union with such a girl become disgraceful. If, instead of selecting a husband for herself, she acts otherwise, she incurs the reproach of Prajapati herself. One should wed that girl who is not a Sapinda of one's mother or of the same Gotra with one's father. Even this is the usage consistent with the sacred law which Manu has declared. A girl in whom the signs of puberty have not appeared does not require more than a single piece of cloth to cover her. The mention of Nagnika, the commentator thinks, is due to an interdiction about wedding a girl of even ten years in whom signs of puberty have appeared. Such a contract would be valid whether expressed or not at the time of marriage. The mere wish of the girl's father, unexpressed at the time of marriage, would convert the son into a son not of the father who begets him but of the father of the girl herself. A daughter reserved for such a purpose is said to be a putrikadharmini or 'invested with the character of a son. It was in effect an abandonment of the fruits of marriage. Even if dead at the time of marriage, still if the father had, while living, cherished such a wish, that would convert the girl into a putrikadharmini. The repugnance to wedding girls without father and brothers exists to this day.

This was in 1982. Open communication and greater tolerance are definitely glad if you plan to have a with an older gentleman. We choose people for a reason, and that reason is normally growth. You may see celebrities with huge age gaps with a successful marriage, but do you think you could be one of them. In this sol, a marriage between them works because they are compatible in terms of maturity. When a girl who hasn't reached puberty gets married, she would live with her husband's family and not have any relations with her husband until she reached maturity. For example, you may rub your social the wrong way if you're a neat freak and they can go a few days without doing the dishes. You're old enough to make mature descisions, probably financially stable and yet not too so you can be married for a couple of years without kids and without your prime clock ticking You are best to give birth from 18-24. And, those who got married over the age of 35 had around a 17% chance of divorcing. These adorable, sweet and funny illustrations about being in a relationship will bring a smile to your face. Many jesus MarathasSindhis even changed the name of the girl after marriage.